Editorial Standards
Purpose of the catalogue
The EDIQU Public Domain Literature Library exists to make historically significant public-domain works accessible to modern readers. It is a curated collection, not a comprehensive archive, focused on narratives of political and military upheaval from the 18th to early 20th centuries.
Scope and selection
Works are chosen for their historical value, readability, and representation of diverse perspectives. The catalogue includes eyewitness accounts, analytical histories, and official records. Selection is the responsibility of the the catalogue, who prioritises works with clear provenance and enduring relevance.
Source attribution
All texts originate from Project Gutenberg, a trusted digital library of public-domain works. Each record includes the original publisher, author, and keywords provided by the source. Derivative editions (such as reading notes or contextual guides) are identified as editorial contributions.
Bibliographic records
Every book page displays title, author, publisher, keywords, target reader, and a catalogue note. The note summarises content and context without reproducing full texts. Dates are included only when present in the source material.
Category assignment
Works are grouped into categories based on thematic and historical coherence. Categories are navigation aids, not rigid classifications. Some works could fit multiple categories; placement reflects the catalogue grouping criteria as to the most useful entry point for readers.
Editorial reading context
the catalogue project has prepared reading notes, contextual guides, and thematic essays for selected works. These are intended to assist interpretation, not to replace the original texts. They are clearly marked as editorial content and do not constitute peer review or academic critique.
Edition facts and text measurements
Each record notes the edition from which the digital text was derived. No textual analysis (such as word counts or comparative editions) is provided. The catalogue does not claim to represent the most authoritative version of any work.
Recommendations and related works
Category guides suggest three recommended works and reading paths. These are based on thematic links and reader interest, not on a ranking of quality. Recommendations are updated as the catalogue grows.
Corrections and reader reports
the catalogue project welcomes reports of errors or omissions via the contact page. Corrections are made at the catalogue project's discretion. The catalogue does not maintain a public errata list but addresses verified issues in subsequent updates.
Public-domain limitations
All works in this catalogue are confirmed to be in the public domain in the United States and New Zealand. Readers elsewhere should verify local copyright status. The catalogue does not guarantee public-domain status in all jurisdictions.
Accessibility and readable presentation
Texts are presented as plain HTML with a clean layout. No multimedia, JavaScript, or external dependencies are used. The design prioritises readability over visual effects.
Independence and editorial responsibility
The catalogue is independently operated by editor EDIQU Catalogue in New Zealand. It receives no institutional funding or sponsorship. Editorial decisions are made solely by the catalogue project, based on a commitment to historical accuracy and reader utility.
What the catalogue does not claim
The catalogue does not claim to represent every perspective or to be a definitive historical record. It does not assert that all works are free from bias or error. No claim is made that every book has been read in full by the catalogue project. The catalogue is not a peer-reviewed academic resource, and it does not offer professional librarian certification.
Ongoing maintenance
The catalogue is periodically reviewed and expanded as additional public-domain works become available. Editorial standards are subject to revision; this page will be updated to reflect any changes.